Platform Interfaces and Gendered Design in Postcolonial Cities: Toward Cultural Sustainability and Ethical Algorithmic Futures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/eyac1567Keywords:
Gendered Algorithms, Platform Cultures, Postcolonial Media, Digital Sustainability, Ethical AI, Inclusive Design, Cultural TransformationAbstract
This paper is discussing how gendered assumptions could be found in the platform interface design, especially under the context of postcolonial digital environment. The research, mainly based on interpretive method and also some interaction simulations, takes examples from mobile platforms in places like Hong Kong, Macao and Singapore. It is trying to find out how different design elements—color, gestures, algorithm of personalization, etc.—are making the digital behaviors of users become normalized in some invisible but effective way.
In this case, interface is not just a tool. It is a cultural thing, and the way it works can be ideological. The study used visual analysis together with experimental design methods. One finding is that gender shows up not directly but through small details. Some personalization strategies, for example, do not always support the user, but sometimes silently limit them.
This article tries to offer a contribution to feminist tech studies and also platform research in general. The idea is to see interface design as something not only technical but also connected to power and also cultural control.
References
[1]Wajcman, J. (2000). Reflections on gender and technology studies: In what state is the art?. Social studies of science, 30(3), 447-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030003005
[2]Wajcman, J., & Young, E. (2023). Feminism confronts AI. Feminist AI: Critical perspectives on algorithms, data, and intelligent machines, 47.
[3]West, S. M. (2020). Redistribution and rekognition: A feminist critique of algorithmic fairness. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v6i2.33043
[4]Costanza-Chock, S. (2018). Design justice: Towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.679
[5]Sundaram, R. (2009). Pirate modernity: Delhi's media urbanism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875421
[6]Udupa, S., & Dattatreyan, E. G. (2023). Digital unsettling: Decoloniality and dispossession in the age of social media. New York University Press.
[7]Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New media & society, 12(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
[8]Zuboff, S. (2019, January). Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. In New labor forum (Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 10-29). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461
[9]Plant, S. (1997). Zeros and ones: Digital women and the new technoculture (Vol. 4). London.
[10]Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. routledge.
[11]Chakravartty, P., & Muller, C. (2024). Anticolonial world-making: racial justice and global communication governance. In Handbook of Media and Communication Governance (pp. 189-199). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800887206.00024
[12]Scott, J. C. (2020). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. yale university Press.
[13]Maragh-Lloyd, R. (2020). Safiya Umoja Noble, Algorithms of oppression. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859919858718
[14]Couldry, N. (2015). Listening beyond the echoes: Media, ethics, and agency in an uncertain world. Routledge.
[15]Eubanks, V. (2012). Digital dead end: Fighting for social justice in the information age. MIt Press.
[16]Lin, J., & de Kloet, J. (2019). Platformization of the unlikely creative class: Kuaishou and Chinese digital cultural production. Social Media+ Society, 5(4), 2056305119883430. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119883430
[17]Cherry, M. A. (2016). Virtual work and invisible labor. Invisible labor: Hidden work in the contemporary world, 71-86.
[18]Kotlarsky, J., Oshri, I., & Sekulic, N. (2023). Digital sustainability in information systems research: Conceptual foundations and future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24(4), 936-952. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol24/iss4/9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zhuowei Li (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
