Collaborative Metacognitive Scaffolding for Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning: A Transformer-Augmented Framework with Real-Time Disciplinary Convergence Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/s61tk754Keywords:
Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning, Metacognitive Scaffolding, Disciplinary Convergence Analysis, Adaptive Learning Technologies, Collaborative Learning FrameworkAbstract
We propose a novel framework for interdisciplinary project-based learning that integrates real-time collaborative metacognitive scaffolding with transformer-based analysis of disciplinary convergence. The conventional approach to interdisciplinary collaboration often lacks structured mechanisms for metacognitive reflection and dynamic feedback, leading to fragmented knowledge integration and suboptimal team performance. Our system addresses this gap through three interconnected components: a metacognitive annotation layer that captures disciplinary perspectives and confidence levels, a cross-disciplinary integration analyzer that quantifies conceptual synthesis using a novel Disciplinary Convergence Index (DCI), and a collaborative workflow optimizer that generates adaptive prompts and peer-matching recommendations. The framework employs a fine-tuned GPT-4 model to process student reflections and produce integrative insights, which are visualized in a shared digital workspace alongside real-time DCI metrics. Furthermore, the system dynamically adjusts project guidelines and mentorship interventions based on detected integration barriers, thereby fostering deeper interdisciplinary synthesis. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves team cohesion and conceptual integration compared to traditional project-based learning environments. The contributions include a scalable architecture for metacognitive scaffolding, a quantitative metric for interdisciplinary convergence, and a practical implementation combining collaborative tools with AI-driven reflection analysis. This work advances the design of learning systems by bridging the gap between metacognitive awareness and interdisciplinary collaboration in project-based settings.
References
[1]RG Klaassen (2018) Interdisciplinary education: a case study. European journal of engineering education.
[2]D Holton & D Clarke (2006) Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.
[3]T Talib & YL Cheung (2017) Collaborative writing in classroom instruction: A synthesis of recent research. The English Teacher.
[4]AM Guerrero-Higueras, C Fernandez Llamas, et al. (2020) Academic success assessment through version control systems. Applied sciences.
[5]HP Yueh & S Hsu (2008) Designing a learning management system to support instruction. Communications of the ACM.
[6]MA Almulla (2020) The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. Sage Open.
[7]S Domokos & M Huey (2023) Simple metacognitive prompts for enhancing student learning: an interdisciplinary study. Journal of Education.
[8]A Yaacob, R Mohd Asraf, RMR Hussain, et al. (2021) Empowering Learners’ Reflective Thinking through Collaborative Reflective Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning.
[9]M Brassler & J Dettmers (2017) How to enhance interdisciplinary competence—interdisciplinary problem-based learning versus interdisciplinary project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning.
[10]M Warr & RE West (2020) Bridging academic disciplines with interdisciplinary project-based learning: Challenges and opportunities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning.
[11]G Evangelinos, N Dixon, et al. (2025) Interdisciplinary Learning Design. Interdisciplinary Modules in Educational Technology and Informatics.
[12]W Zhang, X Zhong, F Fan & X Jiang (2024) Unlocking the creative potential of Chinese new liberal arts: The role of interdisciplinary education, knowledge integration, and metacognitive awareness. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher.
[13]J Oudenampsen, E Das, N Blijlevens, et al. (2024) The state of the empirical evidence for interdisciplinary learning outcomes in higher education: A systematic review. The Review of Higher Education.
[14]M Biasutti & H EL-Deghaidy (2015) Interdisciplinary project-based learning: an online wiki experience in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education.
[15]RG Klaassen, M MacLeod, K Nizamis, et al. (2025) Epistemic Fluency in Interdisciplinary Learning Environments; Interdisciplinary education and the complications of integration. Frontiers in Education.
[16]LS Vygotsky (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. books.google.com.
[17]I Karasavvidis (2002) Distributed cognition and educational practice. Journal of interactive learning research.
[18]JH Flavell (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist.
[19]MTH Chi & R Wylie (2014) The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational psychologist.
[20]A Koriat (2012) The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological review.
[21]HH Clark (1996) Using language. books.google.com.
[22]G Gunn (1992) Interdisciplinary studies. Introduction to Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literatures.
[23]DW Shaffer, D Hatfield, GN Svarovsky, et al. (2009) Epistemic network analysis: A prototype for 21st-century assessment of learning. International Journal of Learning and Media.
[24]SL Star & JR Griesemer (1989) Institutional ecology,translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science.
[25]J Tondeur, D Petko, R Christensen, K Drossel, et al. (2021) Quality criteria for conceptual technology integration models in education: Bridging research and practice. Educational Technology Research and Development.
[26]AH Schoenfeld (2016) Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of education.
[27]AR Kalbhag, P Hegade & A Shettar (2025) Decomposition as Design-Based Intervention for Problem Based Learning. Journal of Engineering Education.
[28]LS Vygotsky (2012) The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. books.google.com.
[29]JL Plass, R Moreno & R Brünken (2010) Cognitive load theory. books.google.com.
[30]RE Mayer (2002) Multimedia learning. Psychology of learning and motivation.
[31]I Beltagy, K Lo & A Cohan (2019) SciBERT: A pretrained language model for scientific text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10676.
[32]JD Novak (2010) Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. taylorfrancis.com.
[33]G Schraw & RS Dennison (1994) Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology.
[34]Y Zhang & BM Wildemuth (2009) Qualitative analysis of content, The Sage Handbook of Social Research Methods.
[35]P Blikstein (2013) Multimodal learning analytics. In International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.
[36]W Hung (2013) Team-based complex problem solving: A collective cognition perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development.
[37]E Novak, R Razzouk & TE Johnson (2012) The educational use of social annotation tools in higher education: A literature review. The Internet and Higher Education.
[38]RS Baker & A Hawn (2022) Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
[39]D Tzimas & S Demetriadis (2021) Ethical issues in learning analytics: A review of the field. Educational Technology Research and Development.
[40]JA Ukaigwe & CU Ezeanya (2024) Analysing Ethical Principles for Machine Learning (ML) Techniques within the Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Institution. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development.
[41]T Baltrušaitis, C Ahuja, et al. (2018) Multimodal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.
[42]K Morrison (2006) Complexity theory and education. In APERA Conference, Hong Kong.
[43]T Dornan (2012) Workplace learning. Perspectives on medical education.
[44]SB Gelmon, C Jordan & SD Seifer (2013) Community-engaged scholarship in the academy: An action agenda. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning.
[45]A Parnami & M Lee (2022) Learning from few examples: A summary of approaches to few-shot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.04291.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 yiming Wang, yuanxing Dou (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.